In the video, Dr. E. Michael Jones, a Catholic historian and author, editor of Culture Wars magazine (formerly called Fidelity Magazine), explains the content of his book The Jewish Revolutionary Spirit and Its Impact on World History (Amazon USA) (Amazon UK) .
Whatever you think of what he says, you should both watch his video and read his book if you want to open and expand your views and stop getting stuck with Islam, as if all problems ended with it.
All those who are aware of Islam and rightly opposed to it should, if they haven't already done so, take a better look at Judaism.
Only people who know very little of Judaism can think that it's doctrinally close to Christianity.
Judaism is very similar to Islam. Judaism is antithetical to Christianity.
We always invite people to take a look at and read the Quran to see for themselves what Islam is. Well, to see what Judaism is take a look at and read the Talmud, where you'll find the most hateful assertions against goyim (a highly offensive term for non-Jews, similar to the word "kaffir" in Islam), Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary.
The "Catholic Church" of the Vatican II in general and Nostra Aetate in particular had been infiltrated by crypto-Jews even at the high levels of its hyerarchies.
The real, pre-existing Catholic Church was Jewish-realist and knew how to deal with Jews: it is the only force that did know how to deal with them. In the same way as the real Catholic Church was also the only force that defeated Islam.
The video below undoubtedly introduces a very perspicacious, profound, accurate, complete and intelligent historiography of the Jewish question, one of the best I've ever encountered.
I have three prima facie objections, though:
1) is it a tested, evidence-based hypothesis that usury is the only cause of the progressive accumulation of wealth in fewer and fewer hands? If you think of a Muslim country like Saudi Arabia, totally implementing sharia law that forbids usury, you see that riches (generally from oil) are indeed in the hands of few. There may indeed be explanations for that, I don't know.
2) Michael Jones reintroduces Marx's theory of capitalists' appropriation of surplus value produced by labour. We know, and Jones knows, that Marx is one of the most potent Jewish forces responsible for the destruction of White, Christian West. How can he reconcile his two positions?
3) Michael Jones elsewhere denies to be a racist, as this would be against his Catholic beliefs. But being race-realist wouldn't be. Sometimes he appears to be opposed to race-realism too, which would be a mistake.
We were all created equal before God, but not equal in our characteristics.
Equality is an ethical prescription, not a factual description.
The second (and the last so far) video of the series will be posted tomorrow.